🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to protect women from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for further review if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in other EU countries